Make Your Voice Heard

Laws and regulations don’t change unless lawmakers hear directly from the people they represent. If you care about the future of self-defense rights, personal safety, and responsible non-lethal options, now is the time to speak up.

Contacting your elected officials is one of the most effective ways to drive real change. A short email or phone call can make a difference—especially when many constituents speak up on the same issue.

Find and Contact Your Representatives

Use the official government tools below to identify and reach your elected officials:

• Find Your U.S. House Representative
  https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

• Find Your U.S. Senators
  https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

• Find State & Local Officials
  https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

Once you find your representatives, tell them why this issue matters to you and ask them to support policies that respect personal safety, individual rights, and responsible innovation.

Your voice matters. Use it.

Byrna Technologies Lawsuit Challenges California Ban on Non-Lethal Pepper Projectile Launchers

A major federal lawsuit filed by Byrna Technologies is drawing national attention and could shape the future of non-lethal self-defense laws in the United States. The case, filed in federal court in San Diego, challenges California’s ban on so-called pepper projectile launchers—devices designed to provide a less-lethal option for personal protection.

The Core of the Legal Challenge

California currently allows the purchase and ownership of lethal firearms and ammunition, as well as traditional pepper spray. However, the state prohibits the sale and possession of pepper projectile rounds used in certain non-lethal launchers. Byrna Technologies argues that this regulatory framework is inconsistent and illogical, especially given the state’s stated goal of reducing gun violence.

The lawsuit contends that banning non-lethal defensive tools while allowing lethal weapons restricts lawful self-defense options for residents. According to the complaint, Californians are being denied access to tools intended to reduce harm and save lives.

Second Amendment Implications

The case centers on whether modern non-lethal weapons are protected under the Second Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has previously ruled that the Second Amendment protects weapons “in common use” for lawful purposes, including self-defense. In a landmark unanimous decision, the Court determined that non-lethal stun guns qualify as protected arms.

Byrna Technologies’ lawsuit builds on this precedent, arguing that pepper projectile launchers fall into the same protected category. If the court agrees, the ruling could establish precedent not only in California, but also for other states with similar restrictions.

Public Safety and Legislative Cooperation

Byrna Technologies has emphasized that the lawsuit is not about escalating conflict, but about expanding access to safer self-defense alternatives. The company positions its products as tools designed to protect families while reducing the risk of fatal outcomes during confrontations.

The case also raises broader questions about how states balance gun control policies with personal safety rights. Critics of the ban argue that preventing access to non-lethal options may unintentionally push individuals toward more dangerous means of defense.

Potential Nationwide Impact

Legal experts note that a favorable ruling could influence legislation and court decisions across the country. As multiple states reconsider self-defense laws, the outcome of this case may play a key role in defining how non-lethal weapons are treated under constitutional law.

The lawsuit represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over self-defense, public safety, and Second Amendment protections—one that could have lasting implications far beyond California.